Did you know ... | Search Documentation: |
![]() | Pack logtalk -- logtalk-3.93.0/docs/handbook/_sources/libraries/sets.rst.txt |
.. _library_sets:
sets
This library provides a set protocol and two implementations of this protocol using ordered lists, one of them a parametric object that takes the type of the set elements as a parameter. Although representing sets as ordered lists is a common solution, the best practice is to regard sets as opaque terms and only construct, access, and update them using the library predicates. For better performance when handling large sets, alternative implementations of the protocol can always be written.
The current implementations use ==/2 for element comparison and standard term ordering. This allows non-ground set elements. But requires caution with later unifications with output arguments and when using the member/2 and select/3 predicates, which can break the ordered representation. Note also that, per the ISO Prolog Core Standard, variable ordering is implementation dependent. This can result in unexpected results and portability issues.
Open the `../../apis/library_index.html#sets <../../apis/library_index.html#sets>`__ link in a web browser.
To load all entities in this library, load the loader.lgt
file:
::
| ?- logtalk_load(sets(loader))
.
To test this library predicates, load the tester.lgt
file:
::
| ?- logtalk_load(sets(tester))
.
First, select a set implementation. Use the set(Type)
object if you
want to type-check the set elements. Otherwise, use the set
object.
To create a new set, you can use the new/1 predicate. For example:
::
| ?- set::new(Set)
.
Set = []
yes
You can also create a new set with all unique elements from a list of terms by using the as_set/2 predicate. For example:
::
| ?- set::as_set([1,3,2,1,2], Set)
.
Set = [1, 2, 3]
yes
Predicates are provided for the most common set operations. For example:
::
| ?- set::(
as_set([1,3,2,1,2], Set1)
,
as_set([7,4,2,5,1], Set2)
,
intersection(Set1, Set2, Intersection)
,
symdiff(Set1, Set2, Difference)
).
Set1 = [1, 2, 3],
Set2 = [1, 2, 4, 5, 7],
Intersection = [1, 2],
Difference = [3, 4, 5, 7]
yes
When working with a custom type of set elements, the corresponding
object must implement the comparingp
protocol. For example:
::
:- object(rainbow_colors,
implements(comparingp))
.
order(red, 1)
.
order(orange, 2)
.
order(yellow, 3)
.
order(green, 4)
.
order(blue, 5)
.
order(indigo, 6)
.
order(violet, 7)
.
Color1 < Color2 :-
order(Color1, N1)
,
order(Color2, N2)
,
{N1 < N2}.
Color1 =< Color2 :-
order(Color1, N1)
,
order(Color2, N2)
,
{N1 =< N2}.
...
:- end_object.
We can then use this object with the set/1 parametric object. For example:
::
| ?- set(rainbow_colors)
::as_set([blue, yellow, violet], Set)
.
Set = [yellow, blue, violet]
yes
For details on these and other provided predicates, consult the library API documentation.
Some predicates adapted from code authored by Richard O'Keefe.