Did you know ... | Search Documentation: |
Pack logtalk -- logtalk-3.86.0/manuals/_sources/devtools/dead_code_scanner.rst.txt |
.. _library_dead_code_scanner:
dead_code_scanner
This tool detects likely dead code in Logtalk entities and in Prolog modules compiled as objects. Predicates (and non-terminals) are classified as dead code when:
Besides dead code, this tool can also help detect other problems in the code that often result in reporting false positives. For example, typos in alias/2 directives, missing scope directives, and missing meta_non_terminal/1 and meta_predicate/1 directives.
Given the possibility of false positives, care must be taken before deleting reported dead code to ensure that it's, in fact, code that is not used. A common cause of false positives is the use of conditional compilation directives to provide implementations for predicates missing in some systems or different predicate implementations per operating-system.
The dead_code_scanner.lgt
source file implements the scanning
predicates for finding dead code in entities, libraries, and
directories. The source file dead_code_scanner_messages.lgt
defines
the default translations for the messages printed when scanning for dead
code. These messages can be intercepted to customize the output, e.g.,
to make it less verbose or for integration with, e.g., GUI IDEs and
continuous integration servers.
This tool API documentation is available at:
`../../docs/library_index.html#dead-code-scanner <../../docs/library_index.html#dead-code-scanner>`__
For sample queries, please see the SCRIPT.txt
file in the tool
directory.
This tool can be loaded using the query:
::
| ?- logtalk_load(dead_code_scanner(loader))
.
To test this tool, load the tester.lgt
file:
::
| ?- logtalk_load(dead_code_scanner(tester))
.
This tool provides a set of predicates that allows scanning entities,
libraries, files, and directories. See the tool API documentation for
details. The source code to be analyzed should be loaded with the
source_data
and optimize
flags turned on (possibly set from a
loader file).
As an example, assume that we want to scan an application with a library
alias my_app
. The following goals could be used:
::
| ?- set_logtalk_flag(source_data, on)
,
set_logtalk_flag(optimize, on)
.
yes
| ?- logtalk_load(my_app(loader))
.
...
yes
| ?- dead_code_scanner::library(my_app)
.
...
For complex applications that make use of sub-libraries, there are also
rlibrary/1-2
predicates that perform a recursive scan of a library
and all its sub-libraries. Conversely, we may be interested in scanning
a single entity:
::
| ?- dead_code_scanner::entity(some_object)
.
...
For other usage examples, see the SCRIPT.txt
file in the tool
directory.
A set of options is available to specify code that should be excluded when looking for unused predicates (and non-terminals):
exclude_directories(Directories)
| list of directories to exclude (default is []
); all
sub-directories of the excluded directories are also excluded;
directories may be listed by full or relative pathexclude_files(Files)
| list of source files to exclude (default is []
); files may be
listed by full path or basename, with or without extensionexclude_libraries(Libraries)
| list of libraries to exclude (default is
[startup, scratch_directory]
)exclude_entities(Entities)
| list of entities to exclude (default is []
)make
tool
The loader.lgt
file sets a make target action that will call the
dead_code_scanner::all
goal whenever the logtalk_make(check)
goal (or its top-level abbreviation, {?}
) is called.
Use of local meta-calls with goal arguments only known at runtime can
result in false positives. When using library or user-defined
meta-predicates, compilation of the source files with the optimize
flag turned on may allow meta-calls to be resolved at compile-time and
thus allow calling information for the meta-arguments to be recorded,
avoiding false positives for predicates that are only meta-called.
This tool can also be applied to Prolog modules that Logtalk is able to
compile as objects. For example, if the Prolog module file is named
module.pl
, try:
::
| ?- logtalk_load(module, [source_data(on)])
.
Due to the lack of standardization of module systems and the abundance of proprietary extensions, this solution is not expected to work for all cases.
This tool can also be applied to plain Prolog code. For example, if the
Prolog file is named code.pl
, simply define an object including its
code:
::
:- object(code)
.
:- include('code.pl')
.
:- end_object.
Save the object to an e.g. code.lgt
file in the same directory as
the Prolog file and then load it in debug mode:
::
| ?- logtalk_load(code, [source_data(on), optimize(on)])
.
In alternative, use the object_wrapper_hook
provided by the
hook_objects
library:
::
| ?- logtalk_load(hook_objects(loader))
.
...
| ?- logtalk_load(code, [hook(object_wrapper_hook), source_data(on), optimize(on)])
.
With either wrapping solution, pay special attention to any compilation warnings that may signal issues that could prevent the plain Prolog from being fully analyzed when wrapped by an object.